Posted by Lauri Gröhn on October 16, 2003 at 00:57:48:

In Reply to: Re: posted by Don Mezei on October 15, 2003 at 12:53:41:

"New ideas and new knowledge, I'd say new ideas represent new tacit knowledge, at least at the moment of creation."

No way. It the idea is explicated it can't be
any "tacit knowledge". And the idea may be wrong.
So one may also ask if ideas are knowledge, either.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: "birth of knowledge" Matt M 08:07:56 10/16/03 (13)
  • Re: "birth of knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 09:32:13 10/16/03 (12)
    • Re: "birth of knowledge" Matt M 09:55:38 10/16/03 (11)
      • The cult of "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 12:26:37 10/16/03 (10)
        • Re: The cult of "tacit knowledge" Sebastián Miralles Acuña 16:13:28 10/16/03 (9)
          • Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 00:11:01 10/17/03 (8)
            • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Sebastián Miralles Acuña 09:07:35 10/17/03 (7)
              • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 09:42:51 10/17/03 (6)
                • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Sebastián Miralles Acuña 10:09:44 10/17/03 (5)
                  • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 11:59:10 10/17/03 (4)
                    • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Sebastián Miralles Acuña 12:04:38 10/17/03 (3)
                      • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 12:21:09 10/17/03 (2)
                        • Online Pharmacy 23:21:47 02/11/04 (0)
                        • test editor 13:13:12 10/17/03 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Name: 

  E-Mail: 

 Subject: 

Message: