|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Lauri Gröhn on October 05, 2003 at 13:20:28:
In Reply to: Re: Ontologies and assets posted by Jerry on October 05, 2003 at 12:36:39:
"Polanyi defined tacit K as not codifiable while explicit K as codifiable."
Yes. Polanyi coined the term. But philosophy
is not (empirical) science and that kind of
definitions and speculations are only worth of
starting some empirical studies. So far no such
research have been available. Using Polanyi's
speculations as facts is called pseudoscience.
- Re: Don't trust Polanyi either (on tacit memory) Igor Perisic 15:33:51 10/22/03 (2)
- Tacit memory of animals? Lauri Gröhn 00:42:05 10/23/03 (1)
- Re: Tacit memory of animals? Igor Perisic 16:12:05 10/24/03 (0)
- Re: Don't trust Polanyi either (on tacit memory) Jerry 14:45:53 10/07/03 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA