Posted by Joseph Murphy on December 17, 2002 at 08:15:29:

In Reply to: Re: RIMSAT is not a KM project? posted by Lauri Gröhn on December 17, 2002 at 04:15:12:

OK... I do see a link to KM, of sorts...! But that doesn't make it a KM project. I've always believed that organizations cannot develop strategies 'in a vacuum'! Developing an overall strategy for development that focuses on improving/implementing KM is, well, unfair. As a coincidence...I just completed a 6month study for a local fire department focusing on a 3-yr strategic business plan.
However, in my study, one of my strategies was improving on IM not KM! But I'm sure that Fire Depts, all over the world, would be very different, especially in responding to demands of both citizens and local government.(I also have first hand knowledge of public sector management.)
I think the weakest part of the RIMSAT case is an apparent belief that KM will drive the essentials. I just don't subscribe to this theory anymore. There are a few other key elements to be included in any strategy, to be successful. KM, in and of itself, will produce what? I remain skeptical.. :o)
Thanks for the response.. joe :o)

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: RIMSAT is not a KM project? Peter Troxler 09:03:26 12/17/02 (7)
  • Re: RIMSAT is not a KM project? Joseph Murphy 12:48:07 12/17/02 (6)
    • How to realise KM in Critical Incidents Mgmt Peter Troxler 05:31:40 12/18/02 (5)
      • Re: How to realise KM in Critical Incidents Mgmt Joseph Murphy 09:07:34 12/18/02 (4)
        • link capability & performance peter troxler 07:28:00 12/19/02 (3)
          • Re: link capability & performance Joseph Murphy 10:01:13 12/19/02 (2)
            • Re: link capability & performance Lauri Gröhn 11:45:58 12/19/02 (1)
              • Re: link capability & performance Joseph Murphy 13:14:23 12/19/02 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: