Posted by Mezei on October 02, 2002 at 17:18:40:

In Reply to: Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up posted by Boris Pluskowski on October 02, 2002 at 15:29:59:

Hi Boris,
OK, let me put it this way. Intellectual capital represents all the entries in the corporate ledger. Like I mentioned earlier in some other posting, we can assign values to the accounts receivable and accounts payable as explicit/tacit knowledge entries.

What I mean is that all these entries represent intellectual capital, (it is 'capital' after all that we're discussing). And at the end of the year, when all the bookkeeping entries are tallied, what is left? Either a profit or a loss. Hence, that's why, after all is said and done, IC is profit (or loss).

What do you think about the KM in a Nutshell posting? I think this might be a major revision of knowledge, info, data thinking...

Don

---

Follow Ups:

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: