|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Mezei on October 02, 2002 at 14:17:42:
In Reply to: Corollary posted by Mezei on October 02, 2002 at 14:11:48:
The way we 'value' the entire process is by using accounting. To do this, we view the organisation as a 'whole', in effect as an individual entity.
Thus, as an individual entity we can apply the description of tacit/explicit knowledge.
So as I mentioned before, accounting is an 'after the fact' record of this individual company's use of tacit and explicit knowledge.
The tacit knowledge is identified as Accounts Payable, or money owed to help formulate the tacit potential of the company's ideas. The Accounts Receivable is the money owed the company for the explicit knowledge sold to buyers.
Don
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA