About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: definition of knowledge with respect to the KM


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ New Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Reilly Atkinson on September 27, 2002 at 14:58:59:

In Reply to: Re: definition of knowledge with respect to the KM posted by Barry on September 27, 2002 at 10:12:32:

Barry -- Your definition has some serious problems, characterisitc of virtually all attempts to define knowledge. Your definition amounts to explaining one concept, knowledge, in terms of two concepts, information and understanding, neither of which are well defined. You start with one problem, knowledge, and end up with two problems, information and understanding.

Something to note: information is always embedded in some context -- the mode of transmission, the surrounding language, the person/s who transmit, the state of the receiver' mind and body, and on and on.

Understanding? I think this is even a tougher concept than knowledge. The notion of understanding subsumes knowledge -- knowledge is one of the things we try to understand, as are information and data. One can argue that understanding leads to new knowledge, or personally altered knowledge. So using "understanding" as a characteristic of knowledge is somewhat circular.

Most of us know and/or recognize knowledge when we encounter it. Why is it so important to devise a crisp definition of knowledge? In my work as a research physicist, and a quantitative business analyst I've never encountered a need for such a definition. Nor is there much evidence that the World has suffered because knowledge remains an elusive notion, and not a crisp one.

If you disagree, let me pose a challenge: take any hour in your day, and record all the knowledge you use during that hour. An exercise like this should convince you of the difficulty of tracking and identifying specific knowledge.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ New Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA