|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Akhil Shahani on September 25, 2002 at 04:47:14:
Hi all,
was recently going thru some of the announcements & counter announcements on development of KM standards by GKEC, KMCI, Entovation etc. It seems they all subcribe to the 'not invented here' philosophy.
correlating that with anthropological theory that states that human beings have a tendency to split large groups into smaller 'tribes' (e.g. in high school you have arbitary groups created like 'nerds', jocks, cool set etc.), what do you think the chances are of the KM practitioner's community all agreeing on even basic standards?
Will application of good knowledge management always bump up against human nature? (try asking all these KM groups to share their research :-))
Take care,
Akhil
- Diversity Denham 08:31:18 09/25/02 (3)
- Re: Diversity Carol 21:59:04 09/30/02 (1)
- Booty and bounty Denham 00:18:40 10/01/02 (0)
- Re: Diversity Akhil Shahani 01:51:23 09/27/02 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA