Posted by Boris Pluskowski on September 19, 2002 at 13:20:05:

In Reply to: Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up posted by Mezei on September 19, 2002 at 12:54:22:

Would be interested in hearing what your definition of Intellectual Capital is - In my mind, there was plenty of intellectual capital involved in the Internet boom - their inability to turn it into physical profits bears no relevance to the value of that capital, as there are a multitude of reasons that could be responsible for that.

In addition, I would consider ideas as being intellectual capital too. They embody a person's total knowledge - both tacit and explicit - in an applied situation.

In fact, when collected in a focussed manner, they are one of the few forms of knowledge which can be measured directly as a result of the action-orientation that they have - which leads to a result (positive or negative) to an identified problem which can then be measured.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up Mezei 19:14:29 09/22/02 (2)
  • Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up Boris Pluskowski 15:29:59 10/02/02 (1)
    • Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up Mezei 17:18:40 10/02/02 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: