|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Mezei on September 19, 2002 at 13:00:56:
In Reply to: Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up posted by Mezei on September 19, 2002 at 12:54:22:
In other words, they had no intellectual capital to speak of, they only had ideas, or tacit knowledge in an organisational sense. So they only had accounts receivable (which is the same as ideas). Which is why they went out of business...
I just hope I'm keeping my accounting legder straight. Accounts receivable above is meant as monies owing to others. Because ideas are expensive to others, thereby requiring an outlay of money.
Don
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA