Posted by Boris Pluskowski on September 19, 2002 at 12:19:44:

In Reply to: Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up posted by Mezei on September 19, 2002 at 10:10:47:

Are you suggesting then, that almost every dot-com that blossomed during the Internet Boom had no Intellectual Capital at all to speak of - seeing as they had no profits to speak of....?

Doesn't sound right to me Don, I don't think you can make your valuation assumptions quite that broadly.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up Mezei 12:54:22 09/19/02 (6)
  • Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up Boris Pluskowski 13:20:05 09/19/02 (3)
    • Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up Mezei 19:14:29 09/22/02 (2)
      • Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up Boris Pluskowski 15:29:59 10/02/02 (1)
        • Re: accounts receivable = tacit knowledge & accounts payable = explicit knowledge - follow up Mezei 17:18:40 10/02/02 (0)
  • typo Mezei 13:00:56 09/19/02 (0)
  • in other words... Mezei 12:56:45 09/19/02 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: