About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: what is a business model?


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ New Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by prac on September 05, 2002 at 16:01:56:

In Reply to: Re: what is a business model? posted by M. Saedi on September 05, 2002 at 01:26:50:

Dear M. Saedi

Wow! You nearly blew me off the chair with this well-written summary.

Before I share a stimulating thought or two with you, let me answer "Yes!" to both your questions.

Here are some thoughts.

The strategic, tactical, and operational-level view of a business has evolved somewhat. Within the Telecomms industry, up to 5 levels have been identified. For business-engineering purposes, I would suggest you look at the following 4 levels for starters:

1)Strategic Level
2) Higher Tactical Level
3) Lower Tactical Level
4) Operational Level

The main benefit of using the 4-tier model is increased granularity at the integration (synthesis) level of business, which is the tactical level. There are many other benefits as well.

Another thought, create a very strong level of cohesion between the financial, knowledge, and HR business models. From a product perspective, a business could become knowledge driven, but finances and HR are also key drivers within a business.

To get a better view of business engineering within your organization, and its architecture(s), I would suggest you view the business as having many interrelated parts, yet having multiple facets to the business, and within each facet another business model may assume the 'Operand' state.

Your suggestion of UML seems feasible, but it has its limitations. Cost is one of them and seamless integration within business another. Within discreet systems development, it definitely has its place. I would suggest you build a simple method instead, which could easily be used by all business units and serve all business models equally. Call it a common language, or communication method if you wish.

May I further suggest you read my notes on the Context Management Method in this forum, which is one such a method I developed.

Thank you for a really fun discussion.;-)

Regards.


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ New Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA