|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Mezei on August 10, 2002 at 17:18:28:
In Reply to: Knowledge and Truth posted by Mezei on August 08, 2002 at 14:15:13:
From what I understand so far, when we know something, we know it to
be true. To know something is to believe it to be true, on a personal
level. So knowledge is an extension of personal belief, thus knowledge
is the reality of the observer.The reason I'm interested is because I've written material on
knowledge management, and in order to understand KM, it as to be
associated with personal experience. So why would we want to manage
knowledge? What are we really managing? We are managing our
perception of reality, which we believe to be true. We are going by
what we know to be true, as the basis for our decisions.When we attempt to manage this process, what are we really doing? From
what I can understand, we can basically divide the entire process into
tacit/explicit, and attempt to manage the dualistic components. And
we do this by 'holding opposing views in mind at the same time, while
continuing to function'.So managing knowledge, or personal truth, is really putting it through
a mental testing ground, I think. I'm not sure though, what the
purpose of the exercise is. If we know something to be true, why would
we break it down into tacit and explicit, then attempt to reassemble
it? Does this create a truth kind of testing bed? Is this the process
for analyzing and verifying truth, or the value of knowledge?So what is the issue, or what is the directive or rationale, all these
ideas can be subject to the verification process, called KM, which is
based on the idea that truth (implicit) is our perception of reality,
and expressed as knowledge (explicit).
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up Jack Vinson 15:05:45 08/13/02 (12)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up Mezei 16:08:12 08/13/02 (11)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up Mezei 16:17:30 08/13/02 (10)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up RJT 13:09:12 08/14/02 (9)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up Mezei 13:53:56 08/14/02 (8)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up RJT 17:09:45 08/14/02 (7)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up Mezei 17:48:37 08/14/02 (6)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up RJT 09:11:36 08/15/02 (5)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up Mezei 09:50:36 08/15/02 (4)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up RJT 04:15:18 08/16/02 (3)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up Mezei 11:25:07 08/16/02 (1)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up RJT 08:37:29 08/17/02 (0)
- Re: Knowledge and Truth follow up Mezei 09:45:28 08/16/02 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA