Posted by TMalik on August 01, 2002 at 20:34:33:

In Reply to: Re: Knowledge Sharing Incentives posted by Prac on July 31, 2002 at 03:47:48:

Prac,

Exactly what I expected that you would furnish my questions with valuable suggestions and solutions to the riddles in my mind. I am tempted to read and write for furtherance.
Before writing to you, I have gladly expanded my search for answers to CFanning. While writing to her, some of your feedback was in the back of my mind. Now allow me to point out how I perceived your paragraphs. After all, it is online communication, which sometimes is contemplated to be perceived different from what the sources mean it to be.
Arduous task, yes it is. Knowledge sharing incentives are oxymoron because of the complications surrounding them—particularly when it comes to the level of competition. It has been hard and it would be hard to gauge and tackle this tacitly rich, yet explicitly scarce thing.
You suggest of classification into different levels. Is it anticipatory classification or post-capturing? If it is the later case, then it goes back to the same node: how to find it. In case of anticipation, the rope may not fit the neck.
Further down, I find what I always had been trying to say that a method may be developed where valied incentives are embraced and others are discarded. I am not as well articulated as you are; so not well said. However, and at least, I am temporarily glad that I got things right—to some level. It is a trigger to awaken my intrinsic incentives to avail this opportunity of discussion.
Next: ‘Knowledge becomes a product’! Thank you for saying that. It feels so great. Internal satisfaction…you may agree that it is nice to be right, even if only sometimes. So can we view it as transaction point between ‘Supply’ and ‘Demand’? I am talking about knowledge wherever it resides: human head, repositories, in the air, underground…
I can’t think of other than agreeing with you that surveys should be manufactured in a way they fit in some sort of built-in family of incentives at a certain time. I mean surveys should be incentives as such.
Yes, at the bottom line, I would like to stand at the same magnitude and in the same dimension of your views. Smart activities demand smart hands.
What a comments I had from you! Thank you!
TMalik

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Knowledge Sharing Incentives prac 15:18:09 08/02/02 (6)
  • Re: Knowledge Sharing Incentives-Research TMalik 21:11:03 08/02/02 (5)
    • Re: Knowledge Sharing Incentives-Research Riva Gianluca 14:46:00 08/05/02 (1)
      • Re: Knowledge Sharing Incentives-Research TMalik 08:39:55 08/06/02 (0)
    • Re: Knowledge Sharing Incentives-Research Prac 10:39:21 08/05/02 (2)
      • Re: Knowledge Sharing Incentives-Research TMalik 14:29:53 08/05/02 (1)
        • Re: Knowledge Sharing Incentives-Research prac 14:23:07 08/06/02 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: