About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: Some pitfalls of first generation KM after a year researching imho


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ New Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Akhil Shahani on June 26, 2002 at 03:16:44:

In Reply to: Some pitfalls of first generation KM after a year researching imho posted by Riva Gianluca on June 24, 2002 at 10:18:45:

Hi Riva,

I think you've covered the problems comprehensively. this is what i think:

1) Best practices: A 'best practice' that defines the specific activites to be performed in a specific situation cannot be universally applied. however, the specific GOALS to be acheived (in whatever way possible) doing a certain activity can definitely be tranferred via database. for example: It may be impossible to tell a salesman exactly what statements to make & in what order while meeting a customer. It would be more useful if the salesman is clear on what he needs to achieve by the end of his meeting (interest in product, agreement for demo, referral etc.) & use his own method of acheiving it.

2) Tacit knowledge: you are right here. however the explicit knowledge of WHO in an organization to contact for WHAT type of information & WHERE to find them is definitely worth having.

3) Technology: I agree

4) Knowledge Worker: I think that today, even frontline staff are expected to use their intellectual capabilites to perform their job effectively. In the older days, they were told to "just shut up, & do what you are told". Organizations have realized since the 1980's that they cannot dictate every aspect of the worker's job (precluding them from the need to think). I feel that the concept of the "knowledge worker" is just in contrast to the "manual worker" & recognizes the need to use your brains no matter what your job is.

5) Strategy: There is an interesting article in "Fortune Magazine" that stated that in a majority of cases, a company's problems are not because their strategy is bad, but because it has been badly executed. A major reason for bad execution is ineffective communication down the the organization. IT can definitely help identify the sources of tacit knowledge in the company here.

Take care,

Akhil




Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ New Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA