|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Reilly Atkinson on April 05, 2002 at 20:17:53:
In Reply to: Questions on theoretical underpinnings posted by Jaci on April 05, 2002 at 10:43:20:
Let me suggest a different view of KM underpinnings, one that comes directly from the sciences. And, quite simply, it's all about empiricism. As has been said before, the capcity of the human mind to tell plausible stories is infinite. Who watches the watcher?
So temper notions of tacit knowledge (pre or post Polyani) with observations of behaviour. If you were to have the luxury, attend a musical master class, for example. No doubt that you will find in practice, the definitions of tacit and explicit knowledge are fuzzy, the distintions are not so clear.
The bad news is, in my opinion, fundamental KM theory is weak. The good news is that neuroscience has come of age, is booming, and is producing a great deal of knowledge on how the brain and mind work.
And, what about the theory that much of KM was invented, even perfected, by the people of the past?
And, finally, I suggest that if the theory be based on one person's idiosyncratic view of the world, then Freud with his idea of conscious and unconscious minds plays the best game in town. But I guess Freud's idea is so old that it is irrelevant. Too bad, it's a lot easier to work with than "tacit and explicit" when it comes to actual behaviour.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
- Mind & knowledge Denham 23:05:11 04/05/02 (5)
- Re: Mind & knowledge Reilly Atkinson 15:10:58 04/08/02 (3)
- Re: Mind & knowledge Denham 18:41:13 04/08/02 (2)
- Re: Mind & knowledge Reilly Atkinson 20:34:46 04/13/02 (1)
- DIK opportunities Denham 22:58:39 04/13/02 (0)
- Re: Mind & knowledge Reilly Atkinson 15:10:15 04/08/02 (0)
- Re: Questions on theoretical underpinnings Jaci 20:28:25 04/05/02 (2)
- Re: Questions on theoretical underpinnings Riva Gianluca 06:56:26 04/10/02 (1)
- Re: Questions on theoretical underpinnings Jaci 09:43:54 04/10/02 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA