About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: Context Management for Deabstracting KM Power


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Prac - Diferrentiation between Complex Management and Context Management on February 27, 2002 at 10:52:38:

In Reply to: Context Management for Deabstracting KM Power posted by Prac on February 26, 2002 at 14:35:29:

Hi All

Seems the above question may be an obvious one. I won't claim to know most of the answers, but I have had to answer this question for myself in order to make progress.

Here is how I see the difference between complexity- and context management.

By the very nature of a context, and systems thinking, one could assume a degree of complexity exists. This initial complexity can be reduced to a very simple picture using the contextual-management method, which I propose.

Context management does not aim to solve or address complexity in a linear manner. It embraces complexity and aims to deliver a method set, in time, to work in a complex environment, without having to understand all the complexity. In my experience, there is not enough time to deal with every complexity, and this is where the context management thinking and method kicks in. It is an attempt to leapfrog the gaps of understanding and to save a lot of time on typically volumes of work, as per example found in the SDLC (systems development life cycle). naturally, the application is limitless, and as such, a very-high level "common" method is proposed, which could be taught to professionals in a brief session or two.

Informal field testing has shown that, what is generally regarded as a complex environment by professionals, may be deabstracted to a relatively simple level of understanding within an hour or two. The method proves great for business planning, in that it could help senior management understand the environment, and see their strategic ideals within a realistic context. As such, the contextual-management method, which is the mere Beta method, is a reality check while sorting out the decision/investment/spend/resource priorities within a particular domain, or environment.

A realistic understanding of "dream" feasibility is a by-product outcome of the process.


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Current Discussion ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA