About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Some important questions


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Riva Gianluca on December 18, 2001 at 11:23:37:

In Reply to: urgent help required --questionaire to judge the usefulness of use of knowledge management in small organisations posted by Sameer Mitter on December 18, 2001 at 09:57:28:

Hi Sameer,
here are some questions which can help the general understanding of the KM issue, not only your small organization.

Section 1)We need a sound concept of knowledge and learning, you might survey the different dimensions of knowledge

1)Theoretical knowledge
a)Where do you gain knowledge about strategies, processes, competitors? Databases, work fellows, external sources such as magazines?
b)How do you usually find it? Effective, useful or the opposite?

2)Practical knowledge:
a)How do workers learn their duties? Mentoring? Training? Learning by doing? Databases?
b)How effective do you consider databases in transferring sense/bodily knowledge?

3)Interactive knowledge
a)How important do you consider to get to know your work fellows to do a god job?
b)If it's important, what's the best way to get to know them? Databases, face-to-face interaction, Groupware, a combine of face-to-face and groupware?

Section 2 Technology and People
Km is about relationship between technology and people, you should evaluate the task-technology match and the social assesment of the value of technology. There's a good questionaire about that on the article "A socio-technical framework for quality assesment of computer information systems" Industrial Management and Data Systems Vol.101 n.5 pp.237-251.

Section 3 Community of practices
a)how often people ask a work fellow for help?
b)How often is the responce no or yes?
c)Are career systems and evaluation schemes fostering cooperation? For istance, is there a peer evaluation about trustworthiness of work fellows? Is that important to gain a promotion or a bonus?
d)Is there some kind of skill-based evaluation or 360 degree feedback?
Hope helps, I can explain further some points if you like...
Regards,
Gianluca


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Current Discussion ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA