|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Andrew A;exander on November 30, 2001 at 22:59:31:
In Reply to: Re: Represents key competency posted by Riva Gianluca on November 30, 2001 at 13:11:32:
Riva
As mentioned Assets + competency = competitive advantage
The value of the competence is considered directly proportional to the ability of a firm to create value.
Hence if you looked good but didnt perform against your competition then swimming would not be the industry you should try and earn money.
Hence key competence is not a matter of appearence but a matter of performance.
I dont know too many people who measure the vaue of anything solely by its appearence. One of the key problems in Km is that projects are proposed on intangible benefits (or looks) and not tangible benefits (or value).
Andrew
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA