About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: Profiles and directories


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Denham on November 15, 2001 at 22:21:35:

In Reply to: Re: Profiles and directories posted by Dave on November 15, 2001 at 12:16:54:

Dave,

Search engines:
This is a complex issue, it depends on how far the organization has moved towards a stable taxonomy, if you need to match keywords or concepts, if you wish to cluster based on similarity scores, the amount of structure you have in the web pages and the extent of atomated meta-tagging you intend to implement. Briefly, if you have a strong, stable organizational taxonomy use Semio, if you are matching based on similarity use Autonomy, if you need a general purpose engine use Verity. Costs vary depending on platform and seats but you will seldom get away under $25k. Public domain search engines will not do the trick IMO.

My approach does not use any formal data collection there is a policy requirement for individuals to complete and maintain a personal homepage on the intranet, there are templates, examples and helpis available to get this done, there are reminders and the homepage is part of the annual review process. The firm size varies from less than 100 to more than 20k. Homepages were not mandatory in all locations or even within every department. The maximum time period was 6 months. There were exception reports generated that allowed supervisors to track compliance.

IMO = In My Opinion

Results with some of the auto-profilers have not been very promising (I have looked at Organik, Tacit, Autonomy and Askme). The web publishing software has varied from Domino, Frontpage, to Websphere, I even did one in Wiki. You do not need a fancy auto-profiler to do yellowpages, in fact I would advise against going down that track until you have developed a stable taxonomy for activities, competencies, roles, responsibilities and authorites and you have a firm wide meta-directory system e.g. LDAP

Try this link for Tom




Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Current Discussion ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA