Posted by Tom Sudman on January 29, 1998 at 18:28:47:

In Reply to: Re: Knowledge,information,data posted by Rob Patzig on January 29, 1998 at 13:28:37:

We are in absolute agreement on your last point, this is a great site! Now on to the picture!

First viewpoint: To me the picture always was and always will be a information artifact. It is static.
Second viewpoint: The picture as an information artifact has become part of a dynamic knowledge community (KC) and process. At early stages this KC thought it was just one of many old family artifacts. Then the KC removed frame and created a theory of old and maybe valuable. KC now expanded to include expert outside advice and validated it was old and valuable. The KC and its knowledge process created value out of by mining its boxes of artifact and that process was intellectual capital. If you had given the box away without the process no value would have been created for the KC. If the box was put in a buried garbage dump no value would have ever come to any KC your or anothers. The knowledge process created the intellectual capital thus value creation.
Tom

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Knowledge Process and Information Artifacts Yogesh Malhotra 20:31:54 1/29/98 (7)
  • Re: Knowledge Process and Information Artifacts Tom Sudman 11:22:12 1/30/98 (6)
    • Re: Knowledge Process and Information Artifacts Yogesh Malhotra 14:25:26 1/30/98 (5)
      • Re: Knowledge Process and Information Artifacts Tom Sudman 16:29:40 1/30/98 (4)
        • Re: Knowledge Process and Information Artifacts R.C.PARK 01:52:36 2/19/98 (0)
        • Re: Experimentation vs. Adaption Yogesh Malhotra 18:49:45 1/30/98 (2)
          • Re: Experimentation vs. Adaption Sam Domenico 10:35:23 8/05/98 (0)
          • Re: Experimentation vs. Adaption Tom Sudman 19:44:57 1/30/98 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: