About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: Knowledge Management for the New World of Uncertainty and Risk


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Rob on October 24, 2001 at 04:00:31:

In Reply to: Re: Knowledge Management for the New World of Uncertainty and Risk posted by Jefferey Bridges on October 22, 2001 at 01:32:04:

Hi Jeff

Never had the opportunity to say thanks for the white paper on partnerships you sent me. Thanks!

Regarding your question, it is something I have thought about a lot, and in my past writings I have been a promoter of the linear/alinear combination thinking. I have also been working on a model to try and incorporate this into KM, but admittedly, it is not an easy matter to address by any standards.

Suffice it to say that I beleive the approach for "new" KM should represent a hybrid of linear/alinear systems. I further believe it should lean stronger towards the fuzzy side.

I a world of increasing insecurity and current randomness, one has to be prepared to trust oneself and others, and I believe the idea of risk management as a driving factor for business would also require a fuzzy hat, a very fuzzy hat indeed.

I think sound judgement, whatever that means in a particular context, would become one of the critical factors of an organization. "New" systems would probably look at measuring and rewarding the applied knowledge of organizational members, and the results based on the application of judgement for managerial staff.

Not much more I can say at this moment, but maybe someone else could add some value.

Your partnership approach seems to be most relevant for the future, as witnessed in personal relationships. Those who cannot establish and maintain complementary relationships, would probably not be able to increase their strength, and thus their protection/competitive performance.

One may have all the best knowledge in the world, but quite frankly, of what use is it if no-one wants to listen to it, or cooperate with you?

Best regards,

Robert Benjamin


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Current Discussion ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA