KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Contact Us | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


On Discussion Threads, Boundaries and Relationships


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Yogesh Malhotra on January 29, 1998 at 00:55:57:

In Reply to: Best Practices for a Virtual Knowledge Community posted by Tom Sudman on January 28, 1998 at 18:45:24:

Tom,

Thank you for sharing the synopsis of the 'facilitators' for knowledge 'flow' on this discussion forum. There is one point that evoked my thinking since similar notions have been discussed earlier and I am still reflecting on such issues.

>A negative observation in search of a positive best practice: it would be nice to have a
>navigation tool which would allow us to know an older thread has become active
>without scrolling and reading dates.

[Another approach - if one wants to follow all the latest posts - could be following the chronological order of the posting of threads. Please note that on rare occasions, some inappropriate/duplicate postings may be found edited out of the forum. Given that what may be posted under any other thread may be relevant to many other threads (remember my last mention of 'relationships' that make 'knowledge' out of 'information'), it seems to be an interesting proposition.]

This relates to my discussion with a senior scholar who has been doing some work on defining the boundaries of knowledge for various academics disciplines. My question to him was: given the increasing interconnections [and the relevance of such interconnections for 'real world' situations] between the traditionally 'pure' disciplines, how can one really drawn any kind of boundaries between disciplines. The issue is compounded given that 'knowledge' of any issue / discipline may be just a proxy for 'ignorance' ('what we yet don't know') about it.

Similarly, drawing boundaries between any two threads may facilitate concrete observations, however, transcending those boundaries may provide one a better perspective of the 'bigger picture' and the 'relationships' between chunks of information. Within this bigger picture, the smaller elements may be defined based on one's own convenience. This is the notion of knowledge 'flow' I earlier mentioned on the forum within which the individual interacts with 'information' and constructs 'knowledge' based on the potential for action one is seeking at that time.

- Yogesh


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Contact Us | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA

KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT