Posted by Chandrasekar P on August 06, 2001 at 23:24:50:

Dear All,

KM focuses on People, Process, Content & Technology;

Now, I have an interesting and curious question:

Should the CKO or the Principal Knowledge Consultant of an organisation report to CEO or Head-HR or Head-Quality or Head-Technology.....?
As an extension, should he be influenced to report to all the Heads....?

When appraising the job of a KM Person, how will be the accountability shared across these functions...?

I do appreciate the fact that the major percentage of the KM goes only in managing the people and their respective process work-flows by attempting to organize the right people to discuss the right thing at the right point in time and to top it, recording everything, and refining it later for the use of everyone of the organization...

So, technology tends to be at low-key when it comes to KM, and only the tacit and explicit knowledge plays a vital role...?

Would u mind throwing some light on this please?

Advance Thanks,

Chandrasekar.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: CKO Reporting Structure Bruce Jones 14:27:58 08/07/01 (6)
  • Re: CKO Reporting Structure Vaughn P Fox 18:19:14 08/10/01 (0)
  • Knowledgeman 007 - License to overkill Martyn R Jones 20:29:30 08/07/01 (4)
    • Re: Knowledgeman 007 - License to overkill Vaughn P Fox 19:25:37 08/13/01 (3)
      • Re: Knowledgeman 007 - Are we writing about the same thing? Martyn R Jones 14:00:20 08/14/01 (2)
        • Correction ... 10788 Martyn R Jones 06:42:26 08/15/01 (0)
        • More over there ... on the other message 10788 Martyn R Jones 06:40:01 08/15/01 (0)
• Re: CKO Reporting Structure Martyn R Jones 04:35:01 08/07/01 (2)
  • Re: CKO Reporting Structure Vaughn P Fox 13:29:58 08/14/01 (1)
    • Forget the name game! this is about roles and responsibilities! Martyn R Jones 06:28:07 08/15/01 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: