[an error occurred while processing this directive]
© 2000 CRC Press LLC
NOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
(KM)is becoming an important
area for IS. In some firms, IS is
called on to provide the infra-
structure to support KM; in others,
the IS function and people play an
integral role in the development of
KM applications; in still other
instances, KM is an integral element
of IS.
There is a danger that IS will
repeat the cycle of the MIS era in this
new era of KM. In that cycle, IS first
was little more than a backroom ser-
vice function, then became recog-
nized as a key enabler of business
processes, and then finally became
recognized as a value-enhancing
core element of the enterprise. To
avoid experiencing this same cycle
again in the KM era, IS must recog-
nize its strengths and weaknesses
relating to KM and seek to proac-
tively play an integral role in it from
its inception.
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
KM is a diverse area because the
potential for applying knowledge
beyond the purview of the individual
who develops it or possesses it is so
great. Moreover, there are many dif-
ferent kinds of knowledge and there
are many processes and systems that
have been developed for facilitating
its explication, transfer, and applica-
tion. For instance, most KM practi-
tioners would list communities of
practice, best practices databases,
expert networks, knowledge reposi-
tories, and virtual workspaces as
common manifestations of KM.
With such diversity, it is difficult
to make generalizations about KM or
even to precisely define it. Various
enterprises define KM in different
ways and have different KM pro-
grams and systems. However, as var-
ious systems are developed and
tested, there are certain principles
that are emerging. Those that most
impact IS should be of interest
because they provide insight into
how IS can make itself more impor-
tant to KM and to the organization.
KNOWLEDGE IS DIFFERENT
FROM INFORMATION
A primary impact of KM on IS is that
it requires the IS function and its sys-
tems to deal with a new entitynot
the familiar data or information, but
knowledge. Those who think that
this distinction is not such a big deal
should consider that while most data
and information are explicit (i.e., exist-
ing in the form of symbols), most of
the organizations knowledge is tacit
in that it exists only in the minds of
individuals or is embedded in the
processes of the organization.
Dealing
even
with
explicit
STRATEGIC PLANNING
Because knowledge management (KM) is based on the nebulous concept of knowledge instead of binary
bits of data,IS managers must adopt a new set of strategies in order to become key players in KM.The
subtle nature of knowledge requires IS managers to sharpen their people skills and to recast information
systems from their traditional roles of processing and disseminating data.
K
PLAYING AN
INTEGRAL ROLE IN
KNOWLEDGEMANAGEMENT
William R. King
WILLIAM R. KING has the title of
University Professor at the University of
Pittsburgh. He has served as founding pres-
ident of the Association for Information
Systems (AIS), as president of the Institute of
Management Science (now INFORMS), and
as editor-in-chief of the MIS Quarterly. He
may be contacted at billking@katz.pitt.edu.